Japanese Man Acquitted after 46 Years on Death Row for Quadruple Murder
In the News
This is a world record for a person to be held on death row , 45 years under threat of execution
And only because of the advancement of DNA was he found to be innocent of murdering a family of four , and apparently set up by the police to prosecute him
I did not realise that It wasn't only the USA that still has the death penalty, Japan is the only other country to still retain it also
With the low crime rates in Japan it makes you wonder if this is helping to keep the country safe , not so in the USA though ?
At least he was not executed before being found innocent, although now aged 88 he does not have much of his life left to enjoy
edition.cnn.com/2024/09/25/asia/worlds-longest-death-row-prisoner-japan-intl-hnk/index.html
Japan is not the only country to still retain the death penalty. There are 56 countries that still retain the Death Penalty. I teach about Capital Punishment in my subject. 5 countries are responsible for the majority of executions. America has killed 2 prisoners this week, the first executions for years.
telmel USA and Japan are the only G7 countries that still have the Death Penalty, that's maybe what the article meant. It is actually 5 prisoners that have been executed in America this week, wasn't sure if the other ones had gone ahead but they have. Another 7 scheduled before the end of the year.
Capital punishment does not stop people from committing crimes. If anything it normalises murder.
I hope this man can have some peace now
Imnotcheap Surely capital punishment stops those who committed those crimes. Whether it is a deterrent is of course debatable, I would say the evidence from many countries shows it is a deterrent but even if it isn't it saves 10s, 100s of millions possibly more. A high security prisoner costs normally about twice as much as a normal prisoner and those cost £52k per year so that is £100k per year and lets say 50 years incarceration is £5 million. Unfortunately there is no statistic for how many Category A prisoners there are but there is approaching 100,000 prisoners in the UK which at £52K per year so is £5.2 billion but of course it will be much more than that due to Category A prisoners plus other costs. Anyway the point is keeping violent murderers in prison long term costs many millions which obviously effects how much can be spent elsewhere.
BonzoBanana They are my thoughts exactly B , the costs are astronomical and do many of these psycho murderers really deserve a life of luxury without paying any bills while other poor people are living on the streets , destitute ?
telmel I think life of luxury might be pushing it a bit but yes they get 3 square meals a day and heated rooms which sadly many on the outside of prison can't afford nowadays. I'd still rather struggle outside than be in prison though. I'm not a believer in sending people who have committed non-violent offences going to prison. Personally as I'm sure I've written many a time I would have them working really hard in farm fields with a ball and chain on their legs and it would be a shorter sentence and any financial loss would be subtracted from their benefits they could claim like pensions if they couldn't claim it from assets, savings etc. In my opinion prison should be mainly for violent offenders. Obviously many thefts do have some element of violence and those would be classed as violent offences but thefts without any violence, shoplifting, stealing parcels from doorstops, fraud etc would not be violent.
BonzoBanana people on death row are also very high security. They have nothing to lose they also have lots of appeals. It's also been proven that the state killing people doesn't deter individuals from doing it.
Imnotcheap How has that been proved because there are so many variables, many countries with strict punishments do have low crime rates. In the UK we keep releasing dangerous evil people back into communities who re-offend often quite quickly those people would find that difficult to do if dead. Do you have a link to a site that claims there is no deterrent? I've occasionally seen such claims on typically anti-death penalty sites but their basis for claiming that is not accurate. However my issue is the system is failing as we become a much poorer country we have very limited resources and the police are constantly having their resources cut as we pile up more and more government debt which has to serviced with interest payments.
Many countries simply have the death penalty due to economic needs to do so and we are getting that way. When an evil murderer is released back into the community you have all the resources of investigating their crime, going through the courts and then again a prison sentence at huge costs. Many of these people aren't your serial killers etc they may be incredibly violent individuals, stabbings etc who somehow got a lenient sentence in the first place.
I saw a statistic that one third of women in prison was due to TV licence evasion/non-payment which is a staggering statistic, the TV Licence shouldn't even exist but non-payment should never result in a prison sentence in my opinion.
We just need to get more realistic about crime and adapt to our current situation.
He must have been relieved. It seems ridiculous calling their system Death Row. If they’re going to execute someone you would think they would have done it within a couple of years.
Pjran Sadly it seems Japan also has corrupt police officers who frame people up or assume guilt rather than doing their job properly. If the death sentence ever came back in this country and it may be a necessity at some point we will need an investigative police force just to check all procedures have been followed and recheck evidence for those who are given the death sentence. This might take 2 or 3 years but still if it can save 50 years of incarceration at huge expense will still save many 100s of millions of pounds. New scientific procedures should make convictions safer but there are always incompetent, corrupt or evil police officers out there.
I always knew Japan had the death penalty, they execute drug dealers ect.. imagine 46 yrs for something you haven't done
I couldn’t believe this when I saw it on the news, he is now a fail old man who was unable to go to the hearing. The whole thing baffles me..
How do you possible compensate someone for that? I write to a guy on Death Row who is fighting an appeal.He was in his 20's when first incarcerated and in his mid 60's now so may even die a natural death before executed.
MelissaLee1 I watched 4 seasons of the neflix documentary 'I am a killer'
It was fascinating to hear about the crimes of murder and hear the prisoners talk about what happened and their feelings about what they did , mainly prisoners in and around Texas as well as other places like missouri
Most had been given the death sentence initially but the law was changed years ago, and depending on certain conditions the death sentences were downgraded to life imprisonment without parole
It amazed me how so many had found God , and were hoping for parole and an eventual release
deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/sentencing-alternatives/life-without-parole
There is quite a few countries that has the death penalty, not just the US and Japan, china has it also, Egypt, yemen, Iraq to name a few
martinlufc5637 there are 56 countries that still have the Death Penalty. USA and Japan are the only G7 countries that have the Death Penalty. I teach about Capital Punishment, so I know lots of useless facts about it .
This is why capital punishment needs to be a slow process to ensure the person is a 1000% guilty. I'm nit saying I agree with it or disagree. It's complicated and complex.
Wow. That is unbelievable. I’m sure it wouldn’t matter how much compensation he gets at this point of his life
Join for free to get genuine deals, money saving advice and help from our friendly community
Chief Bargain Hunter